Let me see if I have this straight.
Politicians and of course the ACLU love to scream “separation of church and state” when it serves their purpose of things like banning prayer from schools, taking the Ten Commandments out of buildings and telling cities they can’t have anything remotely looking like a religious symbol on their letterhead. But, when it serves the purpose of the politician, suddenly no one says a word. If the politician is looking to garner votes and get ahead in a political campaign, it’s fine to mix faith/church with the state.
First off, I need to stress here that the whole idea of separation of church and state is a myth. The phrase does not appear in the Constitution. If anything, those who’ve forced us to take prayer out of school and all the other things mentioned above, are stomping all over the expressed constitutional right of freedom of speech.
Now after saying that, let me move on with what I see as a huge conflict of words vs action here.
A couple weeks ago former Governor Mike Huckabee, who happens to be a Baptist preacher too, appeared in a pulpit one Sunday morning preaching. While the incident kind of flew under the radar, some people did pick up on this. A few Republicans and other conservatives did pick up on the fact that in the past Republicans have screamed foul when Democrats show up in churches and pulpits during an election year. But, for the most part, the incident didn’t draw a lot of attention.
The Democrats were on the move yesterday in celebration of Martin Luther King Junior day. The most obvious was Senator OBama who showed up on the platform of the famed Ebenezer church in Atlanta. In pretty much every news story, it was pointed out that the church is endorsing the Senator in his run for office.
What a minute, what’s up with that!?
James Dobson, the founder and chairman of Focus on the Family faces criticism every time he talks about a political candidate. He was even threatened at one point with loss of charitable status for Focus on the Family for what appeared to be an endorsement of a Republican candidate. As a result, everytime Dobson talks about politics now he’s very careful to NOT use the word endorsement.
What’s the difference here? As the old saying goes - What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Why is it no one is screaming foul now? What makes the appearance of political candidates in various pulpits around the nation any different from the actions of James Dobson or others who’ve been threatened with loss of charitable status for similar actions?
In my opinion, an observant political activist, who might also be involved in trying to put the myth of separation of church and state to rest once and for all, could use some of the recent actions by political leaders to get prayer back into schools.
Just my two cents,
Dr. Rus